<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Quantization on Greg Herlein</title>
    <link>https://blog.herlein.com/tags/quantization/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Quantization on Greg Herlein</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2018-2026. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.herlein.com/tags/quantization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>It Was the Harness, Not the Model — 90% of It</title>
      <link>https://blog.herlein.com/post/harness-not-model/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.herlein.com/post/harness-not-model/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I ran five different coding agents at the &lt;em&gt;same&lt;/em&gt; local model, on the &lt;em&gt;same&lt;/em&gt; task, with the &lt;em&gt;same&lt;/em&gt; frozen test suite — and then I counted why they failed. The answer wasn&amp;rsquo;t subtle. About &lt;strong&gt;90% of the failures were harness problems. Only about 10% were the model.&lt;/strong&gt; And here&amp;rsquo;s the part that should change how you spend your next dollar: throwing a bigger, less-quantized model at it fixed &lt;em&gt;none&lt;/em&gt; of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
