<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasoning-Models on Greg Herlein</title>
    <link>https://blog.herlein.com/tags/reasoning-models/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Reasoning-Models on Greg Herlein</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2018-2026. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.herlein.com/tags/reasoning-models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Right, But It Wouldn&#39;t Stop: Turning Thinking Off in the Agent Loop</title>
      <link>https://blog.herlein.com/post/compare-models-thinking-off/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.herlein.com/post/compare-models-thinking-off/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s a result that surprised me: the reasoning model wrote &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; correct code than the plain one — and still lost. It nailed all 32 test cases, then sat there and refused to declare itself done. Burned the whole time budget re-checking work that was already right. &amp;ldquo;Correct, but won&amp;rsquo;t stop&amp;rdquo; turns out to be a real failure mode, and it&amp;rsquo;s exactly the wrong one for an autonomous agent loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
