<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Waterfall on Greg Herlein</title>
    <link>https://blog.herlein.com/tags/waterfall/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Waterfall on Greg Herlein</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2018-2026. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.herlein.com/tags/waterfall/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Is Waterfall Coming Back? Sort Of. Not Really. Both — And the Bigger Question Underneath.</title>
      <link>https://blog.herlein.com/post/is-waterfall-back/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.herlein.com/post/is-waterfall-back/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s a thing going around the engineering blogs and Hacker News right now: AI killed Agile, Waterfall is back, write your specs up front, welcome to &amp;ldquo;Waterfall 2.0.&amp;rdquo; You may have seen the Medium piece titled &lt;a href=&#34;https://medium.com/@brian_carpizo/agile-is-dead-ai-killed-it-welcome-back-waterfall-e41bfabdd408&#34;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Agile Is Dead. AI Killed It. Welcome Back, Waterfall.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Hmmm.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;And once I followed the logic far enough, I ran into a second question that nobody seems to want to answer out loud: &lt;em&gt;if the agent writes the code, who actually reads it?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
